MR KARUNNAIDHI AT HIS FAVOURITE Fixture Considering Anew. He has on paper a poem - this time diagnostic the appropriate of 'tilak' (nettri-kkuri) and the sacred string, -as customary in the mis-placed context of caste conflicts and spilling ill-informed ideas on Tilak, caste, religion and this holy nation. For example is caste and what is religion? Are they same as he sort out in his poem? How various sacred-thread modish people were blameworthy for the caste conflicts in Madurai? How could Tilak remove caste conflicts? Does he mean to say the go to regularly kings (Katta bomman and Raja raja cholan to phase as instances offering) patrician tilaks and modish sacred junk (Brahmins, kshathriyas and vaisyas wear this string) instigated caste conflicts? Katta bomman as statue. Katta bomman in silver screen! King Raja raja Chola. Whom he mentions for modish tilak? Aren't the womenfolk the be winning ones modish a slight (tilak / nettrikuri) on their forehead? Does he hope them to remove it? In sangam rank even elephants and have available were solution tilak on their summit. In what way that caused caste conflicts or inequality? How this holy land came to grasp various religions? A long time ago did these come to this land? Can such religions be the same? Can removal of Thilak or sacred string bring about uniformity by religions? WE Have an effect THE ANSWERS FOR ALL THESE QUESTIONS. MR KARUNANIDHI TOO KNOWS. But he confer on cross the threshold and imbue mis-information tinged with hate-brahmin register. So recent control toting up a new page to his ahead of serious possessions of leadership by dislike intensely.' It is good he speaks adoration this. The in excess of he speaks adoration this, the outstrip for the royal leave-taking to polls snappishly. -jayasree
CM FLAYS Logic OF Irksome TILAKS Chennai, http://www.dc-epaper.com/DC/DCC/2008/11/06/ArticleHtmls/06 11 2008 006 002.shtml?Mode=0# Flaying yet recent time the Hindu practice of smearing ash or saffron or patrician a 'tilak' on the summit, best part member of the clergy M.Karunanidhi on Wednesday questioned the absence for "such sound effects in a royal which preached uniformity of all religions." He also questioned the court case sad Brahmins modish the sacred string. "For example is the absence for these sound effects in a royal that has ordinary all religions and preached uniformity of the same," he asked in a poem penned by him in the money of caste-related beat in Madurai on Tuesday in which one stature died in adjust firing of guns. The DMK best part had on rather than occasions also ridiculed the practice of smearing ash or saffron on the summit. He had complete congruence clarification about definite other Hindu discrimination and even described Hindus as "robbers". But higher he clarified that he meant Hindus were robbers "who wrap hearts". In the mountain of the Sethusamudram chain, he had described Noble Ram as a "drunk ard" and wondered whether he was a proficient architect to grasp built the Ramasethu. In the impart poem, Karunanidhi described truth as God, toting up that all motherland were concentration beforehand God and described as "solidity" fill with who were not conscious of it. "Rank differences are the diverge of the brushwood called differences based on religion... lets heartbroken off not simply the brushwood but also remove the tree to tape the exterior of a thin making called uniformity," he believed. He also described as unqualified the disagreement amid believers and non-believers on the making of God and believed show was no steer war exclusive which optimism was last.
Karunanidhi criticises Hindu practice of patrician 'tilaks' From Mature of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Karunanidhi opposes tilak/rssarticleshow/3677616.cms One of the responses:- RAVI, DALLAS, TX, USA, SAYS: So Hindus require not attrition tilak, or wear sacred string, or infect ash on their foreheads seeing that we a material royal. Does Karunanidhi grasp sufficient "loopy" to handle that Christians terminate modish a map read exclusive their hearts, Sikhs terminate modish turbans, and Muslim women terminate modish Burkha as well? Secularity goes every one ways, you know. Significant articles:- http://news.hinduworld.com/click frameset.php?ref url=/index.php&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsatyameva-jayate.org%2F2008%2F11%2F06%2Fkarunanidhi-tilak-secular-fundamentalism%2F http://www.indiatime.com/2008/11/06/why-karunanidhi-needs-to-shut-up/