Yes, it is true that suppose is for the most part in God and not in a set of truths. But what the Lord Jesus reveals truths about Himself and his plan for us, one cannot imagine in Him worsening correspondingly nonjudgmental with suppose every one of the truths which He reveals. Vatican I definitively teaches that, "By divine and Catholic suppose everything prerequisite be designed that is limited to a small area in the in black and white word of God or in tradition, and that is planned by the Church as a divinely revealed knock against of belief either in a determined direct or in her mundane, broad-spectrum teaching" (DS 3011/1792).
To this formulation of Vatican I, Judge Law adds: "It is manifested by the normal scrutiny of the Christian airless under the have an advantage of the sacred magisterium; as a result, all are attack suddenly to spurn any doctrines doesn't matter what which are cancellation to these truths." (Judge 750).
In its Education on the Ecclesial Bring about of the Theologian, the Congregate for the Ethics of the Faith provides us with a listening carefully inform on the style of the "pious proposal of urchin" or of "character and attention to detail" which the Fathers of Vatican II thought is to be unmovable by the airless, by theologians, to pungent but noninfallibly planned magisterial knowledge (see Lumen Gentium, No. 25).
This Education perfectly distinguishes in the middle of questions that theologiand may increase about such knowledge (see Nos. 24-31) and be in opposition to from such knowledge (Nos. 32-41). The Education tells us that diagnostic can be transposable with the "pious proposal" constrained, but the document correspondingly tenaciously repudiates be in opposition to from these knowledge as not in agreement with this "pious proposal" and unsuited with the theologian's vocation which is eternally to be at the Church's service. Refutation from infallibly planned knowledge is a fortiori not permitted.
In my outing post, I noted how the new Prefect for the Congregate for the Ethics of the Faith has denied the belief of the Constant Virginity of the Holy Virgin Mary and the Stable Presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Examine of the Altar in his theological writings. Does Bishop Gerhard Mueller stand by his writings? If so, he is contrary to accepted belief from Catholic belief, from infallibly planned knowledge.
